Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Following a call for papers – see earlier post – we can finally reveal our session line-up for the RGS-IBG Annual Conference in Edinburgh in July. We are really excited about the various ways in which our call for papers has been adopted by our speakers – from contemporary and historical perspectives to embodied and representational accounts. The session will be followed by a walking tour in Edinburgh and we include a taster here.

Session

  • Ambivalent spaces: women’s expeditionary work 1913-c.1950. (Sarah Evans, UWE)

The paper will draw upon my ongoing PhD research into women’s involvement with Royal Geographical Society-affiliated expeditions during the twentieth century, presenting material from my preliminary data collection and findings.  Women’s expeditionary work during this period, in common with women’s geographical work more broadly (Maddrell 2009), has until recently been overlooked in histories of the discipline and in studies of expeditionary fieldwork practices (Rose 1993; Bracken and Mawdsley 2004).  The paper will suggest that many of these women occupied an ambivalent position with regard to the largely ‘traditional’ forms of expeditionary fieldwork that they were engaged in, due to their marginal position both in the contemporary academy and in histories of geography.  Whilst some of these women, such as Freya Stark, are already fairly well-known, if within popular and literary discourses, analysing the practices of other more forgotten figures helps to contribute to the ongoing project of (re)telling smaller, and gendered, stories of geographical thought and practice (Lorimer 2005; Lorimer and Spedding 2003; Maddrell, 2009).  Through discussion of particular expeditions, the paper will discuss some of these women’s emotional, embodied/material and discursive experiences, outlining their frequent enjoyment of their expeditionary fieldwork, alongside their more hesitant and unenthusiastic responses.

  • ‘Sharing horizons that are new to us’: planning, freedom and growing up on a 1960s English council estate. (Ian Waites, Lincoln)

English council estates are commonly viewed as problematic and singularly unprepossessing places to live. It might therefore be difficult to imagine someone speaking of the joys of living on a 1960s council estate, but this paper will do exactly that. In May 1964, when I was three years old, my family and I moved into a new house on the just completed Middlefield Lane estate in Gainsborough, Lincolnshire. This is where I spent my formative years during the 60s and 70s, living, playing, hanging around, and growing up. This paper will argue that the ‘form’ of the estate – its situation and layout – ‘functioned’ as a crucial influence on my development, giving me an enduring sense of space, freedom and well being. From there, the paper will consider a more challenging and distinctive line of enquiry – of ‘feeling’, of what the estate felt like for a child at that time. As such, the paper will be unashamedly and enthusiastically autobiographical and lyrical in character, but it will also be underpinned by theories on autobiographical memory and child development in the hope that such approaches can give us a deeper and more nuanced understanding of these estates and their original intentions.

  • Strangely familiar: Parkour, Freerunning and extremes of mundanity. (Kate Evans, Swansea)

Since 2002, the related practices of Parkour and freerunning have become a familiar feature of many British cities, and indeed worldwide.  Cinematic, media, and online depictions of the practices often portray thrilling and spectacular acts of daring and physicality.  Yet for many traceurs (as those who practise parkour are known), the reality of parkour is an intimate and subtle process of embodied and emotional exploration of their bodies and the architectural landscape, where undramatic acts and minutiae are practised with almost tedious repetition.  Whilst the process of repetition itself may be experienced as mundane and/or meditative, each repetition is also a microcosm of diverse, and at times profound, emotional and physical sensations.  This paper considers the extremes of embodied and emotional sensitivity that are interwoven into the more subtle and enduring aspects of parkour as an intimate engagement with space and place, and considers how, through the drilling of mundane acts, traceurs gain embodied understanding if themselves, whilst coming to know and care for the everyday spaces and terrains with which they engage.

  • ‘Greetings from’: postcards from the field. (Ceri Price, Bristol)

Civic pride is easily detectable in official representations. Less accessible are the everyday emotional attachments of local enthusiasts who manifest often unremarked pride in the places in which they live.  A new Bristol museum challenged residents in ten neighbourhoods to produce ‘Greetings from’ picture postcards to showcase what they believed to be special about their locality.  Some local groups, many of whose members are highly knowledgeable about their communities, produced postcards which confirmed perceived expectations; others deliberately challenged them; all were passionate about their home spaces. Yet, as most groups held firm views on what was considered to be appropriate postcard subject matter, the resulting postcards actually highlighted broad similarities between areas, rather than distinctions.  I demonstrate how groups created what they believed to be ‘true’ portraits of their neighbourhoods, but how what actually resulted were idealized, other-directed, images, bearing little resemblance to the specificities of the locales’ everyday geographies.  I examine the seeming paradox of embedded enthusiasts producing unrepresentative representations and, through this fieldwork, address questions of place, placelessness, and non-place in the context of amateur knowledges and productions, noting that notwithstanding the creativity of such projects, everyday enthusiast knowledges often remain configured by dominant representational strategies.

  • Cultures of Architectural Enthusiasm: Fieldwork and exploration with The Twentieth Century Society. (Hilary Geoghegan, Exeter; Hannah Neate, UCLAN; Ruth Craggs, SMUC)

This paper introduces a new research project that investigates the cultures of enthusiasm surrounding 20th century architectural heritage in the UK. Focusing on The Twentieth Century Society (who work to safeguard Britain’s post-1914 architectural heritage), we highlight the important yet underexplored role played by their volunteer guides in articulating, experiencing and interpreting 20th century architecture, specifically focusing on walking tours. Revising and extending work by geographers, historians and contemporary archeologists, this paper attends to the conceptual intricacies of enthusiasm, fieldwork and exploration in relation to buildings.

Walking Tour: Modernist Edinburgh To complement the session “Geographies of Enthusiasm: Exploration and Fieldwork” we invite you to join them on a walking tour that will focus on Edinburgh’s twentieth century architecture.  The tour will commence at the conference venue.  It will begin by looking at University of Edinburgh buildings around George Square (focusing on 1960s expansion: Sir Basil Spence, Glover and Ferguson’s library, Robert Matthew’s Hume Tower, and Alan Reiach, Eric Hall & Partners Appleton Tower).  It will then proceed to take in other twentieth century sites within short walking distance.

Things have been moving along nicely with my Wetland Bird Survey research. I’ve conducted 9 interviews across Cornwall and look forward to my final interview in February with a counter who has heronries as part of his patch. This weekend was the January count for the Wetland Bird Survey and I spent some time at Siblyback Lake on Bodmin Moor and on the Hayle Estuary, nr St Ives. Both days were interesting in terms of weather – bitterly cold, but when bathed in sunshine – absolutely perfect! I will write more soon, but for now – please enjoy this little video of a gull on the Hayle Estuary playing with a golf ball.

With my co-conspirators interested in architectural enthusiasm, I’ve put together a session for the RGS-IBG Annual Conference in Edinburgh this July. The call for papers is below. Please do get in touch if you’re interested. Thanks.

Geographies of Enthusiasm: Exploration and Fieldwork

RGS-IBG Annual Conference 2012, Edinburgh
Sponsored by the Historical Geography Research Group
Organisers: Hilary Geoghegan (Exeter); Hannah Neate (UcLan); and Ruth Craggs (SMUC).

Exploration is a well-established field of research, with geographers examining the contested histories of colonial exploration (Driver, Heffernan, Livingstone); spaces and cultures of modern exploration (MacDonald, Matless, Naylor and Ryan); and, more recently, practices of urban exploration (Bennett, Edensor, Garrett). Associated concepts of the ‘field’ and ‘fieldwork’ have been the subject of sustained focus in relation to teaching practice (Hall et al., Maguire), researcher positionality (Kobayashi, Dewsbury and Naylor) and lived experience (Lorimer). This session extends these debates by examining notions of exploration and fieldwork in other registers.

Hidden and local histories, enthusiast knowledges, as well as popular and professional practices have emerged as themes worthy of further study in relation to exploration and fieldwork. This session is interested in people, places and cultures that have for various reasons been overlooked, regarded as old-fashioned or too readily classed as mundane, non-spectacular, even ‘amateur’. Papers will discuss a culture of exploration that involves romance, revery, memory, as well as political purpose and physical endeavour, and incorporates fieldwork carried out at weekends, on the off-chance or as part of daily life. Focusing on landscapes of exploration in the city, suburbia, and/or the rural, places that are inhabited, cared for and preserved, practices and techniques based upon archaeology, local history and architectural significance, this session offers an opportunity to challenge how geographers have examined people’s understandings of the world, their place within it, and their fascination for it.

We welcome papers on:
* spaces of exploration and fieldwork both historical and contemporary;
* everyday, mundane and undramatic forms of exploration;
* special interest groups, amenity societies and volunteers;
* the role of experts and amateurs in exploring, knowing and caring for places;
* connections between fieldwork, learning and knowing in exploratory landscapes.

Papers on other related topics are also welcome. Please also circulate this CFP to other interested parties.

Please send titles, abstracts of no more than 200 words, names and email addresses of any co-authors, as well as any special a/v requests to Hilary at h.geoghegan@exeter.ac.uk by Friday, 20th January 2012.

Please note: 1) A walking tour will accompany this session – putting discussions of exploration and fieldwork into practice. If you’re interested in hearing more about the walking tour please send an expression of interest to the email above. This sessions forms an important part of the organisers’ British Academy research project ‘cultures of architectural enthusiasm’ – please visit this site for more information: http://conservingc20.wordpress.com/ 2) We would like to draw your attention to the following presenter guidelines outlined by the RGS: An individual may not normally make more than two substantive contributions to the conference programme. A substantive contribution includes: paper or poster presentation (of any length); panel member; discussant or any session contribution of another kind.

Day 2 Counting Birds

The last bit of fieldwork I did with the Wetland Bird Survey was at Swanpool in Falmouth, Cornwall. A husband and wife team who were asked to contribute to the count by a friend 8 years ago and they haven’t looked back. It was a cold morning when we visited the site – but there were plenty of people out and about, either jogging around the ‘pool’ or feeding the birds. One chap feeds the swans every morning. Here is a swan attacking a car  … It had something to do with the mirror I think. Anyway, we chatted about WeBS, favourite species and how the count fits into other retirement activities. This weekend, I will be interviewing 4 more WeBS counters. Weather forecast says: rain/snow/gales … I’ll let you know how I get on.

How do you write?

As if the inter-web isn’t full enough of posts about academics agonising over how to write (as though there is a magic formula), I am going to add to the pile. Lately, I have been agonising over how to juggle multiple writing projects and completing each of them to a satisfactory standard. This is no mean feat when you have a tendency to want everything to be perfect. A site that I have found rather helpful lately is this one, particularly the author’s advice on how to revise and resubmit a paper. http://getalifephd.blogspot.com/2011/03/how-to-respond-to-revise-and-resubmit.html

Twitter seems to be alive with similar schemes as advocated by the blog above … the egg-timer method. Set yourself 45 mins to write and see how you get on. Switching off all distractions, such as Twitter, Facebook, the INTERNET fullstop! One particular scheme is the #sciwrite challenge launched here: http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2011/10/a-writing-challenge/ which follows on from the earlier challenge in 2006 from: http://fumbling-towards-geekdom.blogspot.com/2006/10/inadwrimo.html

Let me introduce: International Dissertation Writing Month (InaDWriMo— Doesn’t that just roll off the tongue?) I know, we’re supposedly writing our dissertations every month. To which I say (oh-so-articulately), yeah yeah, whatever. You might. I spend most months surfing the internet and playing solitaire.** But November will be different.

The rules:

  1. You can set your own goal for the number of words to write. 50 000 is fine for stuff you can just make up, but a dissertation is generally slower going. I’m going to aim for 45 000 words, because I’m pretty much at the making-shit-up stage of my thesis.
  2. It’s up to you whether you choose to count revisions towards your goal or not. I intend to count paragraphs that I substantially rewrite (i.e. if I change the structure of multiple sentences) but not if I just fix grammar or spelling errors.
  3. You are allowed to work on your dissertation before November, and in the months following November too. No, really. It’s positively encouraged. But you can only count the words you actually write in November.
  4. You post some indication of progress on your blog: a daily word count, a progressmeter, whatever. I want to keep tabs on you :)
  5. You ‘register’ in the comments to this post. I want to encourage community spirit keep tabs on you :)

So am I on my own, or am I on my own?

It appears we like challenges and with the proliferation of academic Twitter accounts we thrive as social beings, so mixing the two to keep tabs on our progress is ideal – if it works don’t knock it. I am going to begin with the following challenge:

1) Tidy my desk

2) List my writing projects

3) Prioritise them

Do you know what? Scrap that. I am going to chuck it all on the floor file it all away neatly, turn off Twitter and start writing. :-)

Thesis is now available online

Hello! For those of you interested in what I had to say on the culture of enthusiasm … please check out the newly digitised thesis via: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?did=6&uin=uk.bl.ethos.504805

Fieldwork Season

Well, I am a very lucky researcher. I get to explore all kinds of field sites.

The stunning coasts and heaths of the Lizard Peninsula:

The urban landscapes of twentieth century architecture in London:

The ‘patches’ of the Wetland Bird Survey Counters:

The next couple of months are field season for me. I have several interviews lined up in London and Cornwall to discuss architectural enthusiasm and birding respectively, followed by some visits to document the Lizard. What a wonderful time of the year!

I started my fieldwork with the Wetland Bird Survey counters last week. After a slow start following a call for participants via email, a mail out (old-school letters) worked a treat. I now have 10 counters wishing to take part in the project. I couldn’t be happier. The research involves several stages: meeting and initial interview with counter; visit to site; repeat visit if not on count day; final interview with counter to discuss the count. Whilst this may seem like a laborious task, my purpose is to create a series of, for want of a better word and Hayden Lorimer says it so nicely, ‘small stories’. Snapshots that will be of benefit to my research but also for the WeBS team. These will offer an opportunity to delve deeply into why participants count and their attachments to place over a series of meetings. There will also be a period of time spent analysing an online survey and interviewing WeBS staff in Norfolk. So my first visit was to a couple who have been counting for nearly 8 years, but birding for a whole lot longer. We had superb weather and a chance to chat over a cup of tea. The initial interview lasted just over an hour and a half, and this was followed by a tour of their ‘patch’ – a country park. We discussed motivations, technologies, landscapes and weather. All in all, it was perfect. I can’t wait to get out and meet some more of the folks doing sterling work for WeBS.

Following on from my research on enthusiast groups and societies, I have been keen to understand a bit more about citizen science. I have been drawn to this idea, firstly, by an event on ‘the contribution of the amateur to understanding environmental change’ at the University of Nottingham, where I heard Anna Lawrence from Forest Research speak passionately about cultures of participation. I was also interested in her paper

Lawrence A. (2009). The first cuckoo in winter: British phenology recording, credibility and meaning. Global Environmental Change 19: 173-179.

in which she calls for a closer attention to the inner dimensions of citizen science (for example motivations) and their relationship to the outer dimensions (policy contribution). This really prompted my work on the Wetland Bird Survey. Secondly, chatting to Prof. Muki Haklay at UCL about a possible grant application really got me thinking. He is now director of the Extreme Citizen Science Research Group at UCL and his interest in making technology accessible to citizen scientists around the world really appealed to me.

So what has this go to do with the title of this post? Well, I read with great interest an article in Times Higher Education a few weeks ago about the rise of the citizen scientist, however, I wanted to respond to point out the connections that could be made here regarding a the contribution of citizens to the social sciences, humanities and arts. So here is a link to the original article “Powered by the People: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=417804

And here is my response: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=417932

Mass effects for the arts as well as science

27 October 2011

I was pleased to read Darrel Ince’s article about the rise of the “citizen scientist” (“Powered by the people”, 20 October). Citizens, and the oft-maligned amateur, have been involved in scientific enquiry since before it emerged as the discipline we know today. Professionalisation and questions of trust have served to dissuade scientists from involving citizens in their research projects. But ongoing spending and funding cuts, the scale of global problems and the range of the public’s expertise and enthusiasm make “citizen science” an appealing – not to mention affordable – solution, and the supply of potential citizen researchers is to a degree unlimited.

But I think we can push Ince’s point further. First, let’s not leave the humanities and the social sciences out in the cold. They too could (and are slowly beginning to) feel the warmth that citizen contributions can bring, particularly when we think of the volunteers involved in preservation and heritage, private collectors, local historians, re-enactment societies and so on.

Second, the internet has served to open up the opportunities for citizens to engage with universities and science, yet only a small proportion of the population actively engages in “citizen science”. We need to work on new ways of enticing would-be participants to contribute.

I agree that partnerships, particularly with pre-existing amenity societies, are a step in the right direction. However, notwithstanding current political thinking on bolstering communities and volunteering, the organisation of a national network of citizen enthusiasm, incorporating social media, local hubs (where participants could gather) and universities, requires urgent attention.

Citizens have always been enthusiastic and willing to contribute: we now need to think more creatively about how to harness their power.

Hilary Geoghegan, Associate research Fellow in geography, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter

Whilst I am well aware of the Mass Observation movement and the contribution of other non-academic groups to scholarly research, I felt it needed to be said, that more could be made of the relationships between higher education institutions and amenity societies in order to advance a network of enthusiasm that really harnesses the power of the people!

Hello, I hope everyone had a great RGS conference. I have just heard some sad news about one of my doctoral research participants. Tony Sale, computer enthusiast, passed away last week aged 80. His story of enthusiasm is a great one and I thought I’d share the link to his obituary here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2011/aug/31/tony-sale-obituary. Now, I knew he was involved in something “Top Secret”, but I had no idea he had been Chief Scientific Officer at MI5. His pride and joy was Colossus. A total of 10 colossi were originally built, it was the machine that broke the Lorenz cipher and provided vital information prior to D-Day.  Tony co-ordinated the Colossus Rebuild project. He had to use old photographs as all plans were destroyed. He managed a working party at Bletchley Park that spent over 6000 volunteer hours on the rebuild. I presented some of his work at various conferences. He was a founding member of the Computer Conservation Society (CCS) that worked closely with the Science Museum restoring and rebuilding early computers for display. He spoke passionately about his work and continued to maintain his website, as well as give lectures. Early British Computing has lost one of its most prominent champions, however, his story will hopefully inspire others to get involved.

Here is a small anecdote from my thesis that those of you working with museums and collections will, I am sure, appreciate:

The first working parties of the CCS operated from the old canteen – a temporary building at the back of the Science Museum. Shortly after taking up his post as manager of the computer restoration project in the late 1980s, CCS co-founder [Tony Sale] enquired as to where the rebuild and restoration of the machines chosen to go on gallery could take place. As space was tight in the main Museum, he was offered the old canteen. [Tony] explains: “It was empty so I said, ‘That’ll do alright’. So within a fortnight I had arranged for gigatonnes of Ferranti Pegasus to be moved out of store into the [old canteen]. The Science Museum were in a state of shock. Things didn’t happen that fast in the Science Museum you know”.

I hope you agree this is an excellent story of enthusiasm!

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.